Embodying Psychological Thriving: Physical Thriving in Response to Stress

By E. Epel, Bruce S. McEwen, J. Ickovics. 2010

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a960b390da7b8c1be39c8b4c3363a9ac4623c3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. H. T. Reis
2. Shelly L. Gable
3. N. Collins
4. B. Feeney
5. J. Moskowitz
6. Richard M. Ryan
7. Barbara L. Fredrickson
8. Edward L. Deci

In Behavioral Neuroscience

1. N. Collins
2. B. Feeney
3. Shelly L. Gable
4. E. Epel
5. Michael W. Kraus

In General Health Professions

1. N. Collins
2. B. Feeney
3. H. T. Reis
4. Shelly L. Gable
5. Barbara L. Fredrickson
6. M. Ojala
7. M. Tugade

Citations in the corpus

• The Effects of Stress on Physical Activity and Exercise (2014, unknown): “For instance, resiliency researchers have long stressed that adversity may spur some individuals to higher levels of functioning [376, 377].”
• Positive Social Interactions and the Human Body at Work: Linking Organizations and Physiology (2008, unknown): “Physiological resourcefulness builds on previous work on allostatic load (McEwen, 1988), physical thriving (Epel et al., 1998), and physiological toughness (Dienstbier, 1989).”
• Benefit Finding and Physical Health: Positive Psychological Changes and Enhanced Allostasis (2008, background): “Indeed, the central premise of the model, that benefit finding is associated with more positive profiles of stress responsiveness, has been directly evaluated in only one report (Epel et al., 1998).”
• New Look at Social Support: A Theoretical Perspective on Thriving through Relationships (2014, methodology): “Because thriving connotes growth and development, thriving in the face of adversity involves more than simply returning to baseline or maintenance of the status quo (Carver, 1998; Epel et al., 1998).”
• Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization (2018, background): “Within this framework, social support is not limited to a return to homeostasis in adverse contexts (Carver, 1998; Epel, McEwen, & Ickovics, 1998; Feeney & Collins, 2015) — it can also be an opportunity to grow from the experience in a positive way (e.g., learning from mistakes, being resilient and…”