Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets
By Till Stenzel, A. Frenzel. 2008
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a4e5b95a220b2038dba0a91f025fe2dd1d86635
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Marko P. Hekkert
- T. Foxon
- Karoline S. Rogge
- F. Kern
- Staffan Jacobsson
- Simona Negro
- Jochen Markard
- Roald A. A. Suurs
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Strategy and Management
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Jochen Markard
- Staffan Jacobsson
- Simona Negro
- T. Foxon
- Roald A. A. Suurs
- Bernhard Truffer
- Ugo Rizzo
Citations in the corpus
- A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy (2011, methodology): “Analyses of coevolutionary interactions between technological development, institutional change and business strategies have been used to examine the relative success of firms in different European countries in the 19/20 Century development of the synthetic dye industry (Murmann, 2003); the role of ”
- Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, background): “In addition, the MLP has been criticized for its lack of attention to the micro-level unit of analysis as well as an insufficient conceptualization of strategies at the actor level (Smith et al., 2005; Markard and Truffer, 2008a; Stenzel and Frenzel, 2008).”
- A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations (2012, background): “These developments have been influenced by scientific arguments about the threat of climate change (Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007), and the above economic arguments of the Stern Review (Stern, 2007).”
- Sustainability Entrepreneurship and Equitable Transitions to a Low-Carbon Economy (2006, background): “…it is found that incumbent firms often follow a ‘dual-track’ strategy of acting to prevent changes in institutional rules that would challenge their dominance, while at the same time undertaking limited investment in technological alternatives (Stenzel et al. 2008; Stenzel and Frenzel 2008).”
- The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition (2013, background): “…and wealth in the UK and in turn afforded them the opportunity to exert considerable influence over regulatory developments, primarily via political lobbying (Gkiousou, 2011; Hekkert et al., 2007; Mitchell, 2012; Murmann, 2003; Stenzel and Frenzel, 2008; Unruh, 2000; Wüstenhagen and Boehnke, 2008).”
- ‘Better late than never’: the interplay between green technology and age for firm growth (2017, background): “While ‘emerging green Davids’ usually show higher environmental commitment and attractiveness to sustainable consumers, they often fail to translate their niche market potential into a broad mass market, mainly because of the competition from incumbent ‘greening Goliaths’, through their ‘inner’ form”
- Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition (2014, unknown): “More recent literature, however suggests that regimes can also be drivers of radical change (Stenzel and Frenzel, 2008; Van der Vleuten and Högselius, 2012).”
- Transformation of Infrastructures: Sector Characteristics and Implications for Fundamental Change (2011, background): “This was one reason among others for the slow uptake of wind power by German utilities (Stenzel and Frenzel 2008).”
- The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions (2019, background): “…more radical policy and wider institutional reforms are often politically contested by dominant coalitions, commonly consisting of incumbents who often lobby against major policy changes or try to actively undermine them during implementation (Markard et al., 2015; Stenzel and Frenzel, 2008).”
- Governing community energy: feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany (2013, background): “Comparable earlier figures by Toke (2005) and Stenzel and Frenzel (2008) reinforce notions of this incumbency in the UK wind energy sector.”