Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality in time with weak measurement

By A. Palacios-Laloy, F. Mallet, F. Nguyen, P. Bertet, D. Vion, Daniel Estève, A. Korotkov. 2010

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Macrorealism assumes that a macroscopic object is at any given time in one of the distinct states it has available, and that it is in principle possible to determine which state the system is in without disturbing its dynamics. An experiment now demonstrates that a superconducting microelectronic system violates macrorealism and obeys the laws of quantum mechanics.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/399914d5701012fdba7ce1b552c69e26f2bb3680

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

1 / f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information (2013, background): “…oscillations in superconducting charge qubits (Pashkin et al., 2003), several benchmarking results have been reached in different labs (Di Carlo et al., 2010; Fedorov et al., 2012; Lucero et al., 2012; Mariantoni et al., 2011; Neeley et al., 2010; Palacios-Laloy et al., 2010; Reed et al., 2012).”
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits (2011, methodology): “Very recently, this has been verified experimentally [99] using a voltage-driven box (i.”
Leggett–Garg inequalities (2013, methodology): “[11, 22, 24, 25] Leggett–Garg-like inequalities with semi-weak”
Nonperturbative theory of weak pre-and post-selected measurements (2011, neutral): “[59–74].”