Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task
By William M. Brown, C. Moore. 2000
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/398382a76a61536c6ba26d1990896db1ae0ebd29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Cultural Adaptations to Environmental Variability: An Evolutionary Account of East–West Differences (2011, background): “" This result has subsequently been replicated (e.g., Cosmides and Tooby 1992; Brown and Moore 2000).”
- Smile asymmetries and reputation as reliable indicators of likelihood to cooperate: An evolutionary analysis (2002, background): “Previous empirical findings (i.e. Brown & Moore, 2000) using a different research paradigm (i.e. the Wason selection task) found that subjects could detect genuine altruism.”
- New Evolutionary Perspectives on Altruism: Multilevel-Selection and Costly-Signaling Theories (2002, background): “Just as we are primed to detect cheaters, we also seem to be primed to quickly recognize true altruists who will be trustworthy partners in social exchange (Brown & Moore, 2000).”
- TARGET ARTICLE: Selective Investment Theory: Recasting the Functional Significance of Close Relationships (2006, unknown): “Fitness interdependence processing mechanisms might include, or depend on input from, “modules” thought to be necessary for social exchange (Brown & Moore, 2000; Cosmides, 1989; Cosmides & Tooby, 1992) and friendship (Cosmides & Tooby, 1992; Tooby & Cosmides, 1996).”