Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus.

By William B. Levy, O. Steward. 1983

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis: encoding, storage and persistence (2014, background): “Spike-timing-dependent plasticity [26,27] has been implicated in the learning and expression of, for example, remembered sequences [28].”
Stable Learning in Stochastic Network States (2012, background): “One type of associative plasticity is based on the relative spike timing between presynaptic and postsynaptic cells (Levy and Steward, 1983; Bell et al., 1997; Markram et al., 1997; Bi and Poo, 1998).”
Neuromodulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity, and Theory of Three-Factor Learning Rules (2016, background): “…1993; Martin et al., 2000) that can be experimentally induced by protocols for longterm potentiation (LTP) (Lømo, 1964; Bliss and Lømo, 1973) and long-term depression (LTD) (Lynch et al., 1977; Levy and Stewart, 1983), or STDP (Markram et al., 1997; Bi and Poo, 1998; Sjöström et al., 2001).”
Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. (2008, unknown): “There were some exceptional and very important pioneering studies showing that afferent activation had to be coincident within a hundred milliseconds for LTP to occur (264, 265, 359, 418).”
Learning Input Correlations through Nonlinear Temporally Asymmetric Hebbian Plasticity (2003, background): “Causal temporal ordering of presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes induces synaptic potentiation, whereas the reverse ordering induces synaptic depression (Levy and Steward, 1983; Debanne et al., 1994, 1998; Magee and Johnston, 1997; Markram et al., 1997; Bi and Poo, 1998, 2001; Zhang et al., 1998; Fel”
SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity (2002, background): “Stimulating W and S alternatively with a long interval in between does not result in any change at all (Levy and Stewart, 1983; Gustafsson et al., 1987; Debanne et al., 1994).”
Reactivation of neuronal ensembles in hippocampal dentate gyrus during sleep after spatial experience (1998, background): “While most neurons' activity is inhibited, the di- or trisynaptic connections between granule cell pairs that fire at overlapping places may be selectively enhanced in an asymmetrical fashion as a consequence of LTP (Gustaffson and Wigstrom 1986; Larson and Lynch 1989; Levy and Steward 1983).”
Hippocampal Sharp Waves and Reactivation during Awake States Depend on Repeated Sequential Experience (2006, background): “…of hippocampal function (Buzsáki, 1989; Shen and McNaughton, 1996; Redish and Touretzky, 1998; Redish, 1999) predict that asymmetric plasticity (Levy and Steward, 1983; Bi and Poo, 2001) applied to recurrent connections within CA3 through experience of repeated spatial sequences during theta…”
A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. (2003, background): “…order of stimulation was reversed (i.e., postsynaptic neuron firing an action potential before the weak input), LTD of the weak input was induced (Levy and Steward 1983; Gustafsson et al. 1987; Markram et al. 1997; Magee and Johnston 1997; Bi and Poo 1998; Debanne et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 1998;…”
Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity: A Consequence of More Fundamental Learning Rules (2010, unknown): “However, in neither thread of work was spiking in the postsynaptic neuron controlled or measured (though see Levy and Steward, 1983).”
Spike timing-dependent plasticity: from synapse to perception. (2006, background): “Steward (57) noted that when a weak and a strong input from entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus were activated together, the temporal order of activation was crucial.”