GM Crops: The First Ten Years - Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts

By G. Brookes, P. Barfoot. 2006

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/395fb9a02546671bb372fd0aa2cede12c34f7a44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. G. Otero
2. Steven Sexton
3. David Zilberman
4. Geoffrey Barrows
5. G. Pechlaner
6. R. Garcia-Gonzales
7. Karla A. Quiroz
8. P. Caligari

Citations in the corpus

• Plant tissue culture: Current status, opportunities and challenges (2010, background): “In the same way it is considered that transgenic plants that carry Bacillus thuringiensis genes (Bt plants) can reduce the use of chemical pesticides by 10% (Brookes and Barfoot, 2006).”
• The Neoliberal Food Regime: Neoregulation and the New Division of Labor in North America. (2010, background): “As in the United States, a large percentage of Canada’s key export crops are GM (in 2005, 60 percent of soybeans, 65 percent of maize, and 95 percent of canola [Brookes and Barfoot 2006:6]).”
• Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops (2014, background): “This is estimated to have reduced the environmental impact of cotton pesticides by 25 percent (Brookes and Barfoot 2006).”