Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India
By Tommaso Bobbio. 2013
Subfields: Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- Nithya Sambasivan
- Erin Arnesen
- Ben Hutchinson
- Tulsee Doshi
- Rajesh Veeraraghavan
- Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
Citations in the corpus
- Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021, background): “Documentation has been known to be a weapon to dominate the non-literate in postcolonial societies [83] Also see administrative violence [195].”
- Red Tape, Organizational Performance, and Employee Outcomes: Meta‐analysis, Meta‐regression, and Research Agenda (2020, unknown): “Finally, it is important to note that, while our finding that red tape has a stronger negative impact in post-colonial traditions is based on limited evidence, it does confirm other authors’ view that red tape can be particularly harmful in these settings (e.g., Gupta 2012; Nisar 2018).”
- Dealing with the digital panopticon: the use and subversion of ICT in an Indian bureaucracy (2013, background): “There are also a growing number of anthropologists who look at the state and have begun to disaggregate the state [7,8,14].”