Demystifying Gender Differences in Mentoring:Theoretical Perspectives and Challenges for Future Research on Gender and Mentoring

By Angela M. Young, S. Cady, Marguerite J. Foxon. 2006

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3940ba4ab6c6ee14ecded6be5985074cf3638e1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Émilie Lapointe
2. Christian Vandenberghe

In Education

1. Émilie Lapointe
2. Christian Vandenberghe

In Social Psychology

1. Émilie Lapointe
2. Christian Vandenberghe
3. John P. Meyer

Citations in the corpus

• Informal Mentoring at Work: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2016, unknown): “Most studies conceptualize how individual characteristics such as gender (Young et al. 2006), race or personality (Hu et al. 2008) influence formal and informal mentoring.”
• Supervisory mentoring and employee affective commitment and turnover: the critical role of contextual factors (2017, background): “It is also possible that gender plays a more salient role when examining outcomes known to be affected by gender in the mentoring literature such as career attainment (Ramaswami, Huang, & Dreher, 2014; Young et al., 2006).”