Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes
By J. Fischer, T. Hartel, Tobias Kuemmerle. 2012
378 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/391b5ca0f7fdd75889b91390dc9d6c23f607f00f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Daniel Müller
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- Alexander V. Prishchepov
- Pedro J. Leitão
- T. Sikor
- Christian Levers
- Matthias Baumann
- K. Erb
Citations in the corpus
- Asymmetrical responses of forest and “beyond edge” arthropod communities across a forest–grassland ecotone (2014, positive): “The persistence of open habitats and their associated wildlife depends on the ability to manage the dynamic equilibrium between forest and open habitat (Fischer et al. 2012).”
- Comparing the determinants of cropland abandonment in Albania and Romania using boosted regression trees (2013, background): “For example, cropland abandonment may result in the loss of traditional farming landscapes with high conservation values (Cremene et al., 2005; Fischer et al., 2012) and significant modifications of the carbon cycle (Kuemmerle et al., 2011; Vuichard et al., 2008).”
- Integrating rural development and biodiversity conservation in Central Romania (2013, background): “Such a shift in mind-set could also positively contribute towards the re-coupling of people and nature in Southern Transylvania, which could have major benefits for biodiversity conservation (Fischer et al. 2012).”
- Reshaping agri-environmental subsidies: From marginal farming to large-scale rewilding (2015, background): “Although ‘land sharing’ typically lowers farm yields (Balmford, Green, & Phalan, 2012) and is hence seen as conflicting with agricultural production, we envisage small-scale, low footprint ‘land sharing’ measures – such as key resources that benefit pollination, pest control and resilience to wind d”
- Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, background): “In trying to make the farmer “owner” of the nature conservation problem, lately much attention is shifted toward the goods and services nature delivers to the farmers, such as pollination and pest control (Kleijn et al. 2011; Fischer et al. 2012; Tscharntke et al. 2012).”
- Putting meaning back into “sustainable intensification” (2014, positive): “Often, cultural landscapes represent co-evolved social–ecological systems with high natural and cultural heritage values (Figure 1; Fischer et al. 2012).”
- Mapping the extent of abandoned farmland in Central and Eastern Europe using MODIS time series satellite data (2013, background): “Food production ceases on abandoned land, and abandonment can increase fire risk and lead to the loss of farmland biodiversity and traditional landscapes (Hochtl et al 2005, Dubinin et al 2010, Fischer et al 2012).”
- Leverage points for sustainability transformation (2017, background): “Scholars have called for a strengthening of the direct material links between people and nature in local ecosystems (e.g. Fischer et al. 2012).”
- Hotspots of land use change in Europe (2016, background): “Collectively, our study thus backs up calls for a more context-specific, regionalized policy-making (Shucksmith et al 2008, Fischer et al 2012, van Eupen et al 2012), for better understanding the outcomes of land-use change for ecosystem service flows and biodiversity, and for understanding and…”