Putting meaning back into “sustainable intensification”
By Jacqueline Loos, D. Abson, J. Chappell, J. Hanspach, Friederike Mikulcak, M. Tichit, J. Fischer. 2014
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Health Professions, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/249a99c0baa82857ae960c56a99ea06554850c0d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Patrick Meyfroidt
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- Daniel Müller
- Eric F. Lambin
- Peter H. Verburg
- R. Garrett
- Y. Waroux
- R. R. Chowdhury
In General Health Professions
In Soil Science
- Patrick Meyfroidt
- Peter H. Verburg
- Eric F. Lambin
- Daniel Müller
- Marcus Taylor
- Paul C. Struik
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- R. R. Chowdhury
Citations in the corpus
- Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for? (2018, background): “For the FAO, CSA represented a natural extension to its existing ‘sustainable intensification’ approach tailored to the specific challenges posed by climatic change (Campbell et al. 2014; Loos et al. 2014).”
- Bats in the Anthropogenic Matrix: Challenges and Opportunities for the Conservation of Chiroptera and Their Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes (2016, background): “Short-term increases in yield will come at the cost of reduced structural and taxonomic diversity within agricultural systems (Loos et al. 2014) and concomitant loss of crucial ecosystem services.”
- Middle-range theories of land system change (2018, background): “The potential impacts of land sparing on biodiversity conservation and livelihoods are debated (Loos et al., 2014; Kremen, 2015; Phalan et al., 2016; Fischer et al., 2017).”
- Leverage points for sustainability transformation (2017, background): “…problems can feed into ‘atomized’ conceptualisations of, and solutions to, sustainability problems, where biophysical, social, economic and political facets of sustainability are addressed in isolation from each other, rather than as a set of tightly interacting components (e.g. Loos et al. 2014).”
- Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review (2017, background): “Loos et al. (2014) also argued that the term sustainable intensification is potentially misleading because central tenets of sustainability are not adequately addressed.”
- Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative (2019, unknown): “that support agricultural production (Loos et al., 2014).”
- Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere (2015, background): “…gains attainable in agriculture and forestry through sustained land use intensification combined with more equitable distribution to meet growing societal demands for food, feed, housing, and energy (Neumann et al. 2010, Foley et al. 2011, Tilman et al. 2011, Tomich et al. 2011, Loos et al. 2014).”