Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers
By T. Nechyba. 2000
453 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper uses general-equilibrium simulations to explore the role of residential mobility in shaping the impact of different private-school voucher policies. The simulations are derived from a three-district model of low-, middle-, and high-income school districts (calibrated to New York data) with housing stocks that vary within and across districts. In this model, it is demonstrated that school-district targeted vouchers are similar in their impact to non targeted vouchers but vastly different from vouchers targeted to low-income households. Furthermore, strong migration effects are shown to significantly improve the likely equity consequences of voucher programs.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3915568b68fe26f7b8cd0360f288a0315ed08f5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- N. Kuminoff
- Imran Rasul
- Julien Grenet
- Gabrielle Fack
- Stephen Machin
- Randall Walsh
- S. Gibbons
- Olmo Silva
In Education
- Stephen Machin
- Julien Grenet
- Gabrielle Fack
- Olmo Silva
- Ludger Wößmann
- S. Gibbons
- Dennis Epple
- Richard E. Romano
In Sociology and Political Science
- Imran Rasul
- Randall Walsh
- Stephen Machin
- Richard E. Romano
- Dennis Epple
- S. Gibbons
- Julien Grenet
- Gabrielle Fack
Citations in the corpus
- Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice (2008, background): “…decisions (Armor and Peiser (1998), Vanourek et al. (1998), Greene et al. (1997), Kleitz et al. (2000), Schneider et al. (1998), Glazerman (1997), Nechyba (1999, 2000, 2003), Epple and Romano (1998, 2002), Bayer, Ferreira and McMillan (2004)), they have not estimated heterogeneity in parental…”
- Do Peers Affect Student Achievement in China's Secondary Schools? (2007, background): “Recent theoretical analyses of school choice showing that the introduction of vouchers could increase competition and improve the efficiency of public schools rely on the existence of positive peer effects (e.g. Epple and Romano (1998), Caucutt (2001), and Nechyba (2000)).”
- Valuing School Quality, Better Transport, and Lower Crime: Evidence from House Prices (2008, background): “For example, it seems natural that the price of high quality private education might cap willingness to pay for state school quality via the housing market (Nechyba 2000).”
- Estimating the Effects of Private School Vouchers in Multidistrict Economies (2007, background): “…instance, Peter Bearse, Gerhard Glomm, and B. Ravikumar (2001), Elizabeth M. Caucutt (2002), Danny Cohen-Zada and Moshe Justman (2005), Dennis Epple and Richard Romano (1998, 2003a), Raquel Fernandez and Richard Rogerson (2003b), Charles F. Manski (1992), and Thomas J. Nechyba (1999, 2000, 2003).”
- The New Economics of Equilibrium Sorting and Policy Evaluation Using Housing Markets (2013, background): “…quality, the demographic composition of a community, and open space (Bayer, Ferreira, and McMillan 2007; Tra 2010; Ferreyra (2007) developed a third structural estimator based on the theoretical models and calibrated simulations developed by Nechyba (1997, 1999, 2000) and emphasizes school quality.”
- Bringing the Schools Back in: The Stratification of Educational Achievement in the Chilean Voucher System. (2012, background): “Proponents highlight that, by expanding educational choice and stimulating competition among schools, vouchers will provide alternatives to low-resource families trapped in underperforming public schools and will improve learning (Coons and Sugarman, 1978; Neal, 2002; Nechyba, 2000; Chubb and Moe, 1”
- Choice, Competition and Pupil Achievement (2008, background): “2 See, inter alia, Epple and Romano (1998), Epple, Newlon and Romano (2002), McMillan (2004) and Nechyba (2000, 2003).”
- Do 'Capitalization Effects' for Public Goods Reveal the Public's Willingness to Pay? (2014, unknown): “…area they also vote on the provision of local public goods, they interact with their neighbors, and their collective actions may degrade the natural environment (Nechyba 2000, Calabrese et al. 2006, Bayer and Timmins 2007, Walsh 2007, Banzhaf and Walsh 2008, Kuminoff, Smith, and Timmins 2010).”
- When Do Better Schools Raise Housing Prices? Evidence from Paris Public and Private Schools. CEE DP 119. (2010, methodology): “In this paper, we test the theoretical predictions of models of housing markets in which public and private schools coexist (Nechyba, 1999, 2000, 2003).”