INTRAGUILD PREDATION DIMINISHED IN COMPLEX-STRUCTURED VEGETATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREY SUPPRESSION

By D. Finke, R. Denno. 2002

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/390490d5b3db47d36cd82bd8713fcf4647dadda6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage (2009, background): “Because they are structurally more complex, mixed forests also offer more shelters from adverse conditions to natural enemies (Finke and Denno, 2002) and more nesting sites to insectivorous birds (Barbaro et al., 2007; Dickson, 1979).”
Habitat complexity: approaches and future directions (2011, background): “…of habitat complexity on predator–prey interactions attract almost as much attention as its effects on richness (e.g., Crowder & Cooper, 1982; Finke & Denno, 2002; Warfe & Barmuta, 2004; Grabowski et al., 2008), their implications for the general food web theory are still largely unexplored.”
INTER-YEAR CARRYOVER EFFECTS OF A NUTRIENT PULSE ON SPARTINA PLANTS, HERBIVORES, AND NATURAL ENEMIES (2003, background): “The major natural enemy of Prokelisia eggs is the mirid bug Tytthus vagus Knight (40– 200 individuals/m2; Finke and Denno 2002), and parasitoids of planthoppers such as strepsipterans and dryinids are uncommon at our sites (,5% parasitism; Denno 1983).”
The Influence of Intraguild Predation on the Suppression of a Shared Prey Population: An Empirical Reassessment (2006, background): “Recent work has demonstrated that predator-predator interactions are influenced by features of the physical environmental within which they interact (MacRae and Croft 1996, Roda et al. 2000, Norton et al. 2001, Snyder and Ives 2001, Finke and Denno 2002 ), the relative body sizes of predators and o”
DOES INTRAGUILD PREDATION ENHANCE PREDATOR PERFORMANCE? A STOICHIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE (2004, background): “Both Tytthus and Grammonota were selected as intraguild prey because they are so abundant on the marsh and play key roles in interactions with Pardosa and Prokelisia planthoppers (Döbel and Denno 1994, Denno et al. 2000, Finke and Denno 2002).”
BEHAVIORAL INDIRECT INTERACTIONS: MULTIPLE PREDATOR EFFECTS AND PREY SWITCHING IN THE ROCKY SUBTIDAL (2004, background): “This dampening effect is common in multiple-predator experiments (e.g., Wissinger and McGrady 1993, Crowder et al. 1997, Finke and Denno 2002) and adds to the growing empirical evidence that increased food web complexity can stabilize food webs (Kondoh 2003).”
Beneficial effects of flower-dwelling predators on their host plant (2004, background): “Finke and Denno (2002) report a similar situation in which vegetation complexity by providing refuges modulates the interaction between spiders and their hunter mirid prey.”
Biological Control of Insect Pests in Agroecosystems: Effects of Crop Management, Farming Systems, and Seminatural Habitats at the Landscape Scale: A Review (2010, background): “Negative interactions, such as intraguild predation, can be reduced in complexstructured vegetation and complex food webs, respectively, through avoidance between natural enemies and higher prey and host availability (Finke and Denno, 2002; Meyhöfer and Hindayana, 2000).”
Trophic supplements to intraguild predation (2007, methodology): “We use as a starting point the three species IGP model used by Hallam (1986) and Holt and Polis (1997).”
MIGHT NITROGEN LIMITATION PROMOTE OMNIVORY AMONG CARNIVOROUS ARTHROPODS (2003, background): “…selection by predators, however, potential differences in prey nutrition are confounded by differences in prey behavior, size, toxicity, or abundance (Rosenheim et al. 1993, Endo and Endo 1994, Strohmeyer et al. 1998, Toft and Wise 1999a, Eubanks and Denno 2000b, Stamp 2001, Finke and Denno 2002).”