Beneficial effects of flower-dwelling predators on their host plant
By G. Romero, J. Vasconcellos‐Neto. 2004
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4807c72c77bb271a16a4a2fab11f389cbb9e917
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Y. Basset
- V. Novotný
- Thomas Michael Lewinsohn
- Graeme D. Ruxton
- J. Ness
- J. Skelhorn
- K. Fiedler
- D. Janzen
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Insects on Plants: Diversity of Herbivore Assemblages Revisited (2005, background): “Herbivore community studies can be further complicated by numerous indirect and diffuse effects (Strauss & Irwin 2004) mediated by their predators (Romero & Vasconcellos-Neto 2004) or shared parasitoids [apparent competition (e.g., Morris et al. 2004)].”
- The evolution and ecology of masquerade (2009, background): “…will fall outside this definition because predacious insects can either increase or decrease the number of viable seeds that their host plants produce by consuming seed-eating insects and pollinators, respectively (Louda, 1982; Suttle, 2003; Romero & Vasconcellos-Neto, 2004; Knight et al., 2006).”
- A mutualism's indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators (2006, background): “…larcenists or flower-dwelling predators of pollinators, can have indirect positive effects on plants (Maloof and Inouye 2000, Irwin et al. 2001, Romero and Vasconcellos-Neto 2004), the ant guards of F. wislizeni can have indirect costs to the plant (in addition to the direct cost of…”