Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.

By Daniel Balliet, P. V. van Lange. Psychological bulletin, 2013

630 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2118a942b6bd0f6734c9ab7ab9169c4bfb654ee3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Junhui Wu
3. Daniel Balliet
4. C. D. De Dreu
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Tom Lane
7. Bogdan Wojciszke

In Social Psychology

1. Daniel Balliet
2. P. V. van Lange
3. Junhui Wu
4. C. D. De Dreu
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
7. Bogdan Wojciszke
8. Dean Tjosvold

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Daniel Balliet
3. Junhui Wu
4. Cristian Vaccari
5. Andrew Chadwick
6. C. D. De Dreu
7. Gerben A. van Kleef
8. Tom Lane

Citations in the corpus

• Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, background): “BGR predicts that there should be relatively stronger amounts of intergroup discrimination under mutual outcome interdependence, because people have a generalized expectation that their ingroup members will cooperate (Brewer, 2008; Yamagishi et al., 1999; see also Balliet & Van Lange, 2013).”
• Generalized Trust Four Lessons From Genetics and Culture (2015, background): “There is also recent evidence suggesting that the mere presence of punishment in social dilemmas (e.g., publicgood dilemmas) promotes cooperation, but especially in high-trust cultures (Balliet & Van Lange, 2013b).”
• Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News (2020, background): “Individuals are less likely to cooperate in contexts where trust is low, and this is particularly the case in highconflict situations—such as the polarized politics of our times (Balliet & Van Lange, 2013).”