Situated literacies : reading and writing in context

By D. Barton, M. Hamilton, R. Ivanič. 2000

1,517 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tracing the Everyday 'Sitings' of Adolescents on the Internet: a strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces (2003, background): “New London Group, 1996; Alvermann et al., 1998; Barton et al., 2000), we seek to interpret how broad forms of semiotic mediation are made to ‘count’ as literacy (Gallego & Hollingsworth, 2000).”
What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education (2009, background): “the resulting influx into higher education of 'non-standard' entrants, though a small number of articles reflect an interest in the 'minority standpoint epistemologies' of gender, race, sexuality and disability which are developing at this time in sociology (Ball 2004).”
Assessing English-Language Learners’ Achievement (2008, background): “He was also influential in bringing increased attention to the research of functional linguists such as Halliday and British, European, and Australian researchers on what later came to be known as the “new literacies” research paradigm (see, e.g., Gee, 2004; and Barton, Hamilton, and Ivanic, 2000).”
A Review of the “Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies (2010, background): “A criticism of the New Literacy Studies, and one that its proponents have con-ceded is as yet unresolved, is the need for researchers to limit what counts as literacy (Barton, Hamilton, & Ivanic, 2000, p. 95).”