Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences, and consilience

By Robert U. Ayres, Jeroen van den Berrgh, J. Gowdy. 2001

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3896ddd0b712aa6a8b02c48b3c6e973e9b39865b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Ernst Worrell
2. Robert U. Ayres

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Ernst Worrell
2. Peter P. J. Driessen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ernst Worrell
2. Robert U. Ayres

Citations in the corpus

• Sustainability economics: Where do we stand? (2008, background): “This is the essence of what is meant by " strong sustainability " as elaborated by a number of authors, including (Guts, 1996; Gowdy and O'Hara, 1997; Goodland, 1999; Ayres et al., 2001; Ayres, 2001; Pezzey and Toman, 2002; Neumayer, 2003).”
• Mineral resources: Geological scarcity, market price trends, and future generations (2016, background): “(2007), Goodland (1995), Hansson (2010), Ayres et al. (2001), van den Bergh (2010), and White (2013). The argumentation behind the “weak sustainability” concept is that the current generation needs commodities today in order to construct a society that improves the living conditions for current and ”