Academic Capitalism and the New Economy

By L. Waks. 2005

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/388350db70266680c25757d2e5f127c958feffc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Kean Birch
2. J. MacLeavy
3. D. Tyfield
4. Maksim Belitski
5. Simon Springer
6. Amy Metcalfe
7. K. Olds
8. J. Spring

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Preservice Preparation and Early Career Support on Novice Teachers’ Career Intentions and Decisions (2013, background): “The benefits of rigorous educational experiences are multiple, but ensuring high-quality educational engagement remains a persistent challenge in teaching training programs where students are increasingly consumers of education rather than learners in preparation (Slaughter & Rhoades, 2004).”
• Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? (2019, background): “When marketing technology 279 to industry, the TTO should be efficient in navigating conflicts of interests and values between a 280 scientist, university and a private firm (Slaughter and Rhoades, 2004), which rarely happens.”
• Global Assemblage: Singapore, Foreign Universities, and the Construction of a “Global Education Hub” (2007, background): “The era of ‘‘academic capitalism’’ (Slaughter & Rhoades, 2004) had yet to seriously emerge.”
• Theorizing the Bioeconomy (2013, methodology): “This colonization includes the enactment of a global IPR regime (Orsi and Coriat 2006; Sell 2003); the growing commercialization of academia (Slaughter and Rhoades 2007; Mirowski and Sent 2008); the appropriation of indigenous knowledges (Oldham 2007 ; Shiva 1998); and other things beside.”
• The Handbook of Neoliberalism (2016, background): “This has taken multiple forms, including (Tyfield 2012a: 11; Slaughter and Rhoades 2004; Radder 2010): • increased privatization of research funding • commercial ‘accountability’ and ‘relevance’/‘impact’ criteria in competitive public funding • growth in university–industry relations and direct…”
• Revisiting Academic Capitalism in Canada: No Longer the Exception (2010, methodology): “As such, in this paper I revisit Slaughter and Leslie’s study of academic capitalism in Canada, but with the benefit of statistics released after their book was published in 1997 and aided by the further theoretical development of academic capitalism by Slaughter and Rhoades (2004).”
• Research on Globalization and Education (2008, background): “The OECD and GATS have promoted a global market in higher education by turning some university administrations into business centers concerned about profitability through expansion into foreign markets (G. Rhoads & Slaughter, 2006; Schugurensky, 2006; Sidhu, 2006).”