Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on ‘cash for care’ schemes

By C. Ungerson. Ageing & Society, 2004

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38737c34363fd08e259a3b7a9c3972e31fa9a087

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. J. Convery
2. Wolfgang Keck
3. C. Saraceno
4. S. Cahill
5. Virpi Timonen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. C. Saraceno
2. Wolfgang Keck
3. J. Convery
4. S. Cahill
5. Virpi Timonen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Saraceno
2. Wolfgang Keck

Citations in the corpus

• Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries (2006, background): “6 Ungerson (2004) identified these two factors (commodification and employment regulation) as crucial in determining the outcomes of the cash-for-care programmes for care-recipients and care-givers.”
• CAN WE IDENTIFY INTERGENERATIONAL POLICY REGIMES IN EUROPE? (2010, background): “In most countries, they are paid to the care-dependent person, but in some (eg, the United Kingdom) they are paid directly to the family carer (see, eg, Ungerson 2004 ; Timonen et al .”