CAN WE IDENTIFY INTERGENERATIONAL POLICY REGIMES IN EUROPE?

By C. Saraceno, Wolfgang Keck. European Societies: The Official Journal of the European Sociological Association, 2010

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities (2011, background): “Developing Orloff’s (1993) original suggestion, they may be conceptualised as being at the intersection of two parallel familialism by default/supported familialism/defamilialisation (Leitner 2003; Saraceno 1997, 2000, 2010; Saraceno and Keck 2010).”
‘Social Investment’ or Back to ‘Familism’: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family and Care Policies in Italy and Spain (2014, background): “…that facilitated, if not encouraged, the role of women as carers in the private domain, whereas in the latter familism has largely been ‘unsupported’ (Keck & Saraceno 2010), meaning a strange kind of subsidiarity principle whereby such familistic culture is in fact the justification for the…”
Post-Socialist Housing Systems in Europe: Housing Welfare Regimes by Default? (2015, background): “We note that familialism can be either supported (by the state) or unsupported (familialism ‘by default’; Saraceno & Keck, 2010).”
Late-Life Loneliness in 11 European Countries: Results from the Generations and Gender Survey (2016, background): “Southern and Eastern European cou tries are generally characterized by a more familistic and collectivistic orientation than the more individualistic Northern and Western European countries (Reher 1998; Saraceno and Keck 2010).”