Board Interlocks and Firm Performance: Toward a Combined Agency–Resource Dependence Perspective

By Fabio Zona, Luis R. Gómez-Mejía, Michael C. Withers. 2018

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38729ba39fbf1e0048abfd66d3db2a13db29064b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Thomas M. Zellweger
2. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
3. Pankaj C. Patel
4. Alfredo De Massis
5. James J. Chrisman
6. Franz Willi Kellermanns
7. J. Kotlar
8. Nadine H. Kammerlander

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Thomas M. Zellweger
2. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
3. Pankaj C. Patel
4. Alfredo De Massis
5. James J. Chrisman
6. Franz Willi Kellermanns
7. J. Kotlar
8. Nadine H. Kammerlander

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Thomas M. Zellweger
2. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
3. Pankaj C. Patel
4. Alfredo De Massis
5. James J. Chrisman
6. Franz Willi Kellermanns
7. J. Kotlar
8. Nadine H. Kammerlander

Citations in the corpus

• In the Horns of the Dilemma: Socioemotional Wealth, Financial Wealth, and Acquisitions in Family Firms (2018, background): “For instance, Zona, Gomez-Mejia, and Withers (2018) argue that executives often engage in interlocks to gain prestige and influence in the industry rather than for financial reasons.”
• Islamic Governance, National Governance, and Bank Risk Management and Disclosure in MENA Countries (2017, unknown): “Also, a neoinstitutional perspective may facilitate the examination of the potential interactions among IGQ, NGQ and RDPs (Ntim et al., 2013; Zattoni & Van Ees, 2012; Zona et al., 2015).”