VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce

By Jan M. Noyes, Kate J. Garland. 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/385808b13624c8be17e166ee3acef8cc2985eb73

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jan M. Noyes
2. Kate J. Garland

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jan M. Noyes
2. Kate J. Garland

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Jan M. Noyes
2. Kate J. Garland

Citations in the corpus

• Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? (2008, methodology): “…learning or comprehension, measured in terms of correct answers, have tended not to find differences between materials presented in the two forms (e.g. Mason et al. 2001, Mayes et al. 2001, Noyes and Garland 2003, van de Velde and von Gru¨nau 2003, Bodmann and Robinson 2004, Garland and Noyes 2004).”
• Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension (2013, background): “In one study (Noyes & Garland, 2003), they compared reading on a computer (VDT [video display terminal]) versus reading on paper while measuring study and reading times, factual recall and comprehension.”