Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension

By Anne Mangen, B. Walgermo, K. Brønnick. 2013

731 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fa31cb21c5d246432e5e6433a1381942793bfa5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Lauren M. Singer
2. Joseph B. Walther
3. Jochen Peter
4. Patti M. Valkenburg
5. Patricia A. Alexander
6. Emily M. Grossnickle
7. Kathryn S. McCarthy
8. Danielle S. McNamara

In Education

1. Jochen Peter
2. Patti M. Valkenburg
3. Lauren M. Singer
4. Patricia A. Alexander
5. Mark D. Griffiths
6. Emily M. Grossnickle
7. Danielle S. McNamara
8. Kathryn S. McCarthy

In Gender Studies

1. Jochen Peter
2. Patti M. Valkenburg
3. Joseph B. Walther
4. Patricia A. Alexander
5. Laura Vandenbosch
6. J. V. Oosten
7. Paul J. Wright
8. Jane D. Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Media Effects: Theory and Research. (2016, background): “Media comparison studies also started to focus on the differential effects of reading on paper versus screens (via tablets or e-readers) for learning and information processing (e.g. Mangen et al 2013, Small et al 2009).”
• Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal (2017, background): “Some studies reported that reading comprehension was better in print than in digital (e.g., Mangen, Walgermo, & Bronnick, 2013; Noyes et al., 2004), while others documented better comprehension when readers processed texts digitally rather than in print (e.g., Kerr & Symons, 2006; Verdi, Crooks, &…”