Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere

By Christian Azar, Kristian Lindgren, E. Larson, K. Möllersten. 2006

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Mechanical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38229fae6fde536a20cefe8b270b5065b3e50926

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Mechanical Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Climate economics support for the UN climate targets (2020, background): “By contrast, the minimum SCC in 2020 in the 95 1029 (66) percentile range is $19 ($56) increasing to $129 ($448) in 2100.”
Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management (2014, background): “BECCS could be an energy technology with net negative emissions that sequesters carbon during growth and captures and stores conversion emissions underground indefinitely (Azar et al. 2006; Fisher et al. 2007).”
The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) (2010, methodology): “GET is also a linear optimization model designed to choose primary energy sources, conversion technologies and transportation technologies that meet (in this version) a price elastic energy demand, at the lowest aggregate costs, subject to a carbon constraint (a tax or an emission cap).”
Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization (2014, background): “…possible combination of CCS with electricity, liquid fuel, or gas production from biomass, which can lead to negative emissions in the long term (Azar et al. 2006; Clarke et al. 2009; Tavoni and Tol 2010; van Vuuren et al. 2007), and (iii) the compatibility of CCS with existing supply chains,…”
The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling (2013, background): “Many (concentration) overshoot scenarios aim to profit from net negative emissions in the second half of the century (Azar et al. 2006; Azar et al. 2010; O’Neill et al. 2010; Read and Lermit 2005; Van Vuuren et al. 2007).”
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “…gross CO2 emissions can be larger than the carbon budget as long as they are simultaneously compensated by negative emissions (figure 1) (Kriegler et al 2014, Riahi et al 2015, Eom et al 2015, van Vuuren et al 2013, van Vuuren and Riahi 2011, van Vuuren et al 2007, Azar et al 2006, 2010).”