THE QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC EDUCATION: A CASE‐STUDY OF URBAN INDIA†

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan (2008, methodology): “5 These age-groupings are the same as those used in Subramanian and Deaton (1991) and in Kingdon (2005) for India.”
Low cost private schooling in India: Is it pro poor and equitable? (2011, methodology): “* Statistically significant at 5% level of significance. method of analysis is logit regression modelling, much-used in similar research such as Kingdon (1994, 1996), Dreze and Kingdon (2001), Alderman et al. (1996) and Rose and Al-Sammarai (2001).”
The relative effectiveness of government and private schools in Pakistan: are girls worse off? (2009, methodology): “Kingdon’s (1996) examination of the relative effectiveness and efficiency of different school types in urban Lucknow District in the Uttar Pradesh state of India also used the Heckman approach to correct for sample selection bias.”
Does growth in private schooling contribute to Education for All? Evidence from a longitudinal, two cohort study in Andhra Pradesh, India (2013, background): “…with the poor quality of the government sector where teacher absenteeism is rife (Harma 2009; Kingdon, 2007; Pal, 2010), and the perceived superiority and advantages offered by English-medium teaching in private schools (Kingdon, 1996), not traditionally available in the government sector.”