Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach

By Claus-Heinrich Daub. 2007

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37e335b19277fa89e74ea1bda38d608603823634

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Prabanga Thoradeniya
2. Rebecca Tan
3. Aldónio Ferreira
4. Janet Lee
5. A. Skouloudis

In Strategy and Management

1. Ionica Oncioiu
2. Prabanga Thoradeniya
3. Camelia Oprean-Stan
4. Sebastian-Emanuel Stan
5. Rebecca Tan
6. Aldónio Ferreira
7. Janet Lee
8. Iulia Iuga

Citations in the corpus

• Sustainability Reporting and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (2015, methodology): “, 2005), investors (Epstein and Freedman 1994; Wilmshurst and Frost, 2000; Magness, 2006), environmental groups (Deegan and Gordon, 1996), financiers, general public/society, potential employees (Hedberg and Malmborg, 2003) and other stakeholders (Daub, 2007) influence organisational environmental r”
• Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece (2010, background): “In this regard, Daub (2007) comments that: ‘‘.in the case of the ‘‘Global Reporters’’ studies from SustainAbility/UNEP and the best Canadian reporters, only large, mostly multinational companies were evaluated.”
• Impact of Sustainability Reporting and Inadequate Management of ESG Factors on Corporate Performance and Sustainable Growth (2020, background): “The new term is “sustainability reporting” as the name for the latest integrated form of cultural, environmental, and social reporting [25].”