Best Practices in the Population Assessment of Problem Gambling

By Robert J. Williams, R. Volberg. 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37a8b80ccb6239bbfe606d4ed6674a0eea830d9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Volberg
2. Robert J. Williams
3. Robert J. Williams
4. R. Hann
5. D. Schopflocher
6. Beverly L. West
7. Patricia McLaughlin
8. N. White

Citations in the corpus

• The classification accuracy of four problem gambling assessment instruments in population research (2014, methodology): “However, there has been some criticism of their conceptual underpinnings and validity (Abbott & Volberg, 1992; Neal, Delfabbro, & O’Neil, 2005; Stinchfield, Govoni, & Frisch, 2007; Williams & Volberg, 2010).”
• Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling (2015, methodology): “The Behavioural Addiction Measure (BAM) is also an adaptation of the Problem and Pathological Gambling Measure (PPGM) (Williams & Volberg, 2010, 2014).”