The classification accuracy of four problem gambling assessment instruments in population research

By Robert J. Williams, R. Volberg. 2014

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4e6b98a147a9fcb618882218163a9da2126636b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Per Binde
2. U. Romild
3. R. Volberg

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Per Binde
2. U. Romild
3. R. Volberg

Citations in the corpus

• Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey (2017, methodology): “As recommended in several recent analyses of prevalence data (Currie, Hodgins, & Casey, 2013; Stone et al., 2015; Williams & Volberg, 2014), a cut-off of five or more was used in classifying respondents as problem gamblers.”