Recruitment variation related to fecundity in marine fishes

By S. Rickman, N. Dulvy, S. Jennings, J. Reynolds. 2000

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/377980f4cbf8e393cf013b62dc568c45a6ee246d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Predicting Extinction Vulnerability in Skates (2002, methodology): “…body size and the two measures of range size using both cross-species regression, in which each species contributed one data point to the analyses, and phylogenetically based comparative analyses (Felsenstein 1985; Harvey & Pagel 1991; Martins 1997; Rickman et al. 2000; Reynolds et al. 2001).”
Why Should We Closely Monitor Fecundity in Marine Fish Populations (2008, background): “For most exploited marine species, fecundity is related to recruitment variation (Rickman et al., 2000), and stock-recruitment models representing relationship between parental population and number of offspring produced are widely used to assess stock viability (Marshall et al., 2006).”
Weak cross‐species relationships between body size and trophic level belie powerful size‐based trophic structuring in fish communities (2001, methodology): “The comparative approach has already been used to assess links between life histories and vulnerability to fishing (Jennings et al . 1998; Reynolds, Jennings & Dulvy 2001) and life histories and recruitment variation ( Rickman et al . 2000 ).”
Conservation biology of marine fishes: perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk (2001, background): “Mertz and Myers (1996) could find no association between fecundity and variance in reproductive rate among 36 species of marine fishes (including elasmobranchs, clupeids, gadids, scombrids, and pleuronectids), and a comparison of phylogenetically unrelated marine-fish taxa by Rickman et al. (2000) ”
Methods of assessing extinction risk in marine fishes. (2004, background): “Phylogenetically independent analyses can remove bias, noise and lack of statistical independence that occur in simple cross-species analyses by incorporating relatedness among taxa (Rickman et al. 2000; Reynolds et al. 2001; Freckleton 2002).”
Understanding fish habitat ecology to achieve conservation (2005, background): “), or becomes a ‘‘bet-hedger’’, typically a broadcast spawner with multiple learned spawning aggregations on much finer scales (Rickman et al., 2000; Einum & Fleming, 2004).”
Stock and recruitment: generalizations about maximum reproductive rate, density dependence, and variability using meta-analytic approaches (2001, background): “However, if taxa are combined, then a slightly positive relationship emerges (Rickman et al., 2000).”
Patterns and prediction of population recovery in marine reserves (2000, background): “Cushing, 1996; Chambers and Trippel, 1997) and by the fecundity of spawners (Koslow, 1992; Rickman et al., 2000).”