A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method
By R. Venkata Rao. 2008
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3766e34abdeb6387746722c90e0a83efe9eb51d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Ali Jahan
- Yusof Ismail
- S. Sapuan
- Marjan Bahraminasab
- German Gamazo
- Md. Yusof B. Ismail
- Faizal Bin Mustapha
- Shankar Chakraborty
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Ali Jahan
- Yusof Ismail
- S. Sapuan
- Marjan Bahraminasab
- German Gamazo
- Md. Yusof B. Ismail
- Faizal Bin Mustapha
- Irik Z. Mukhametzyanov
In Materials Chemistry
- Ali Jahan
- Yusof Ismail
- S. Sapuan
- Marjan Bahraminasab
- German Gamazo
- Md. Yusof B. Ismail
- Faizal Bin Mustapha
- Irik Z. Mukhametzyanov
Citations in the corpus
- Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. (2011, background): “Similar approaches can be found in Rao [32], who applies themethod formaterial selection for a given engineering application, or inLihongetal.”
- A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process (2012, methodology): “Pair-wise comparison methods include AHP [ 8 , 26, 27], digital logic approach (DL) [7], modified digital logic approach (MDL) [28], eigenvector [29], and weighted least square method [30].”
- A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection (2011, methodology): “In this case, Shanian and Savadogo [46] used a combination of revised Simos method [38] and entropy approach [23,41,42] to define the importance degree of criteria, but Rao [19] in VIKOR technique only used the weight of entropy approach, so in order to make a comparison between the proposed model a”