Blipped-Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (blipped-CAIPI) for simultaneous multi-slice EPI with reduced g-factor penalty

By Kawin Setsompop, Borjan A. Gagoski, Jonathan R. Polimeni, Thomas Witzel, Van J. Wedeen, Lawrence L. Wald. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2011

1,292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Simultaneous multislice Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) acquisition using parallel imaging can decrease the acquisition time for diffusion imaging and allow full‐brain, high‐resolution functional MRI (fMRI) acquisitions at a reduced repetition time (TR). However, the unaliasing of simultaneously acquired, closely spaced slices can be difficult, leading to a high g‐factor penalty. We introduce a method to create interslice image shifts in the phase encoding direction to increase the distance between aliasing pixels. The shift between the slices is induced using sign‐ and amplitude‐modulated slice‐select gradient blips simultaneous with the EPI phase encoding blips. This achieves the desired shifts but avoids an undesired “tilted voxel” blurring artifact associated with previous methods. We validate the method in 3× slice‐accelerated spin‐echo and gradient‐echo EPI at 3 T and 7 T using 32‐channel radio frequency (RF) coil brain arrays. The Monte‐Carlo simulated average g‐factor penalty of the 3‐fold slice‐accelerated acquisition with interslice shifts is <1% at 3 T (compared with 32% without slice shift). Combining 3× slice acceleration with 2× inplane acceleration, the g‐factor penalty becomes 19% at 3 T and 10% at 7 T (compared with 41% and 23% without slice shift). We demonstrate the potential of the method for accelerating diffusion imaging by comparing the fiber orientation uncertainty, where the 3‐fold faster acquisition showed no noticeable degradation. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Subfields: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/374b5fcf4b17df02f93fd0bc73c3a5f095ef1eaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Stephen M. Smith
  2. Olaf Sporns
  3. Matthew F. Glasser
  4. Christian F. Beckmann
  5. Steven E. Petersen
  6. Jesper L. R. Andersson
  7. Saâd Jbabdi
  8. Kamil Ugurbil

Citations in the corpus