Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter?

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, unknown): “…differences in public support for gasoline taxation when climate change mitigation was either framed as leading to ‘higher prices’ or to ‘higher taxes’ (Villar & Krosnick, 2011), while a UK experiment finds somewhat more support for ‘carbon’ rather than ‘energy’ taxation (Parag, Capstick, &…”
The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model (2015, result): “For example, whereas some studies used the term “global warming” others used “climate change” or “global climate change” e which could explain some variation in itself (cf. Leiserowitz, Feinberg, et al., 2014; Villar & Krosnick, 2011; Whitmarsh, 2009).”
What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010 (2016, background): “Party affiliation has been reported to interact with the effect of labeling, with Republicans rating CC as a more serious problem than GW,(19,20) and Democrats rating GW as more serious.(20) In a careful and comprehensive study, Benjamin et al.”