Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets

By Lucio Fuentelsaz, Jaime Gómez. 2006

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3705589af37043d1095bc58ead5f6399db572eee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Michael Lounsbury
2. Danny Miller
3. G. Fisher
4. Tieying Yu
5. Albert A. Cannella
6. James J. Chrisman
7. Alfredo De Massis
8. W. Wales

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Danny Miller
2. G. Fisher
3. Tieying Yu
4. Michael Lounsbury
5. Albert A. Cannella
6. Luis Araujo
7. Donald MacKenzie

In Strategy and Management

1. G. Fisher
2. Tieying Yu
3. Danny Miller
4. Michael Lounsbury
5. Albert A. Cannella
6. Matthew G. Grimes
7. Joel Gehman
8. Gerd J. Hahn

Citations in the corpus

• Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management (2017, background): “Although some markets may exhibit relatively static, single convergence points, such cases may be rare, and many markets may bear more convergence points because of multipoint competition (Fuentelsaz and Gómez, 2006), multiple strategic groups (Peteraf and Shanley, 1997), or rugged landscapes (Levin”
• A Comprehensive Review of Multimarket Competition Research (2013, methodology): “Using data from the Spanish banking industry, Fuentelsaz and Gómez (2006) reported the same conclusion.”