Voluntary Environmental Investment and Responsive Regulation
By John W. Maxwell, Christopher S. Decker. 2006
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36db3d6e1ce9640a18352f29e3823e564e3b5d9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Magali A. Delmas
- Michael W. Toffel
- Thomas P. Lyon
- George Deltas
- D. R. Harrington
- Daniel C. Matisoff
- Madhu Khanna
- John W. Maxwell
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Strategy and Management
- Magali A. Delmas
- Michael W. Toffel
- Thomas P. Lyon
- Madhu Khanna
- George Deltas
- John W. Maxwell
- D. R. Harrington
- Daniel C. Matisoff
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box (2008, background): “Firms might participate to gain favorable publicity or greater flexibility in complying with existing regulations, or to deter the imposition of new regulations (Decker, 2005; Lyon and Maxwell, 2004; Maxwell and Decker, 2006; Segerson and Miceli, 1998).”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective (2008, background): “Indeed, Maxwell and Decker (2006) show that if a firm voluntarily makes an observable investment in pollution control that lowers its marginal cost of abatement, then it is optimal for the regulator to monitor the firm less frequently.17”
- Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008) (2014, background): “Similarly, the record on the relationship between business investment, environmental performance, and regulatory stringency is mixed (Porter and van der Linde 1995, Maxwell and Decker 2006).”
- Environmental Public Voluntary Programs Reconsidered (2007, background): “Maxwell and Decker (2006) present a model of programs such as Performance Track that reward good corporate behavior with a reduced likelihood of inspection.”
- Adoption of Pollution Prevention Techniques: The Role of Management Systems and Regulatory Pressures (2009, background): “…of itT on itY consistently if the following conditions are satisfied (Wooldridge 2002): the error term has zero conditional mean; the variance of the error is constant; the standard rank condition is satisfied; and the TQEM adoption is adequately described by a probit model (Wooldridge 2002).”