CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility?

By J. Munksgaard, Klaus Alsted Pedersen. 2001

586 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36c68eb979cd5c37b3ed0b8d3170bdba0d1a40d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. G. P. Peters
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. Richard Wood
6. D. Guan
7. E. Dietzenbacher
8. Klaus Hubacek

In Environmental Engineering

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. G. P. Peters
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. Richard Wood
6. D. Guan
7. E. Dietzenbacher
8. Klaus Hubacek

Citations in the corpus

• Review of existing literature (2014, background): “The study was further extended by Munksgaard and Pedersen (2001) and Lenzen (2001) to calculate the amount of energy and greenhouse gases embodied in a value unit of commodities produced by Danish final consumption.”
• A consistent input–output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility (2005, background): “In Denmark for example, Munksgaard and Pedersen (2000) report that a significant amount of power and other energy-intensive commodities are traded across Danish borders, and that between 1966 and 1994 the Danish foreign trade balance in terms of CO2 developed from a 7 Mt deficit to a 7 Mt surplus,…”
• Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies (2016, background): “to attach “responsibility for emissions” to a particular type of agent (consumer, producer, extractor, or income beneficiary) and consequently to allocate emissions to that agent.(3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12) This literature can be interpreted to be based on the principle of compensatory justice (i.”
• The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change (2008, background): “This staggering statistic begs the question of who should be responsible for the emissions resulting from the production of China’s exports (Munksgaard and Pedersen, 2001).”
• China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in international and interprovincial trade (2012, methodology): “Two calculating principles (production accounting principle and consumption accounting principle, Munksgaard and Pedersen, 2001) are applied.”
• A synthesis of carbon in international trade (2012, background): “When there is international trade between regions, for example, consumption-based inventories that add the emissions associated with imports and subtract the emissions associated with exports are often 10 considered (Peters, 2008; Peters and Hertwich, 2008a; Peters et al., 2009; Munksgaard and Peder”
• The CO2 'trade balance' between Scotland and the rest of the UK: Performing a multi-region environmental input-output analysis with limited data (2008, methodology): “Such an attribution, under what Munksgaard and Pedersen (2001) identify as a ‘consumption principle’ would place the responsibility for pollution generation occurring in one legislative domain to decisionsmade in another legislative domain.”
• Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: Comparing two approaches (2008, methodology): “Since we already know that international indirect effects are important (Munksgaard and Pedersen, 2001) and environmental responsibility is sensitive to the level of data aggregation (Lenzen et al., 2004), it is important to develop a solid methodology to estimate disaggregated international…”
• Impact of inter-sectoral trade on national and global CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis of China and US (2010, background): “’’ This question has been discussed by many researchers (Munksgaard and Pedersen, 2001; Bastianoni et al., 2004), who suggest that different rules of responsibility would lead to significant changes in greenhouse gas emissions of Annex B and non-Annex B countries.”
• BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION (2013, background): “The latter is reflected in increasing debates about the national responsibilities for the damages expected from climate change (Munksgaard and Pedersen 2001; Peters 2008; Peters and Hertwich 2008; Peters et al. 2011).”
• Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches (2010, background): “Since the place where the production of goods and services takes place does not need to be the same as the place where these products are ‘consumed’, we can define the responsibility of a country from two sides: the producer or the ‘consumer’ standpoint1 (Proops et al., 1993; Steenge, 1999; Munksgaa”