Adaptive Herbivore Ecology. From Resources to Populations in Variable Environments
By C. Whelan. 2004
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36bcc55417fc2defd9fcb4fb645e49712a202808
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- T. Piersma
- Anne Dekinga
- J. Gils
- Jaap van der Meer
- Mikael Fortelius
- R. Drent
- A. Mysterud
- Cédric Bacher
Citations in the corpus
- Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition (2004, methodology): “1), or formally: IR long-term = min( IR short-term , d max ) eqn 5 Restricted to herbivores, this model has been formulated earlier by Fryxell (1991), Wilmshurst, Fryxell & Colucci (1999), Wilmshurst, Fryxell & Bergman (2000) and Owen-Smith (2002).”
- The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores (2006, background): “The smaller Soay sheep are not able to survive on heather, and have no buffer when the main forage is in short supply at high population density (Owen-Smith 2002).”
- Precipitation and large herbivorous mammals I: estimates from present-day communities (2010, background): “A number of researchers have shown a relationship between aspects of large mammal herbivore communities and local environmental conditions (e.g. Bell, 1971; Jarman, 1974; Gordon and Illius, 1989; Caughley and Gunn, 1993; Clutton-Brock et al., 1997; Mysterud et al., 2001; Owen-Smith, 2002).”
- Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice (2005, background): “The best-known alternative type of diet models that considers a digestive constraint, linear programming models (LPM; Belovsky 1978, 1984, 1986), has been criticised for its inability to consider many prey types and for being circular (Owen-Smith 2002).”