DISPERSAL IN PATCHY VOLE POPULATIONS: ROLE OF PATCH CONFIGURATION, DENSITY DEPENDENCE, AND DEMOGRAPHY

By H. Andreassen, R. Ims. 2001

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dispersal within a spatially structured population of lesser kestrels: the role of spatial isolation and conspecific attraction (2003, background): “In this way, dispersal rates have been said to be density-dependent both for the source and the recipient subpopulation (Andreassen & Ims 2001; Gundersen et al. 2001).”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “Andreassen & Ims (2001) suggested that ‘patch-size dependent demography’ might explain greater emigration from small patches.”
Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? (2003, unknown): “Edge crossing behaviour Mauremooto et al. 1995; Mills 1995; Schultz and Crone 2001 , perceptual ability Yeomans 1995; Zollner and Lima 1997 , and density effects Herzig 1995; Rhainds and Gries 1997; Andreassen and Ims 2001 have all been demonstrated to influence movement.”
AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF WHETHER HABITAT CORRIDORS AFFECT POLLEN TRANSFER (2005, background): “Not all studies support corridor theory (Rosenberg et al. 1998, Bowne et al. 1999, Collinge 2000, Danielson and Hubbard 2000, Andreassen and Ims 2001).”