Driving forces behind the stagnancy of China's energy-related CO2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: The relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change

By Libo Wu, S. Kaneko, Shunji Matsuoka. 2005

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3650e09c9bd9998088ba16145fc67362ea99f6ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. D. Guan
2. Kuishuang Feng
3. Yuli Shan
4. Zhifu Mi
5. Klaus Hubacek
6. Jiali Zheng
7. Xiaoling Ouyang
8. Chunping Xie

In Environmental Engineering

1. D. Guan
2. Kuishuang Feng
3. Yuli Shan
4. Zhifu Mi
5. Klaus Hubacek
6. Jiali Zheng
7. Xiaoling Ouyang
8. Chunping Xie

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Kuishuang Feng
2. D. Guan
3. Klaus Hubacek
4. Zhifu Mi
5. Chunping Xie
6. Yuli Shan
7. Xiaoling Ouyang
8. Jiali Zheng

Citations in the corpus

• Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China (2012, background): “Researchers also found that clean technology had a negative effect on CO2 emissions in China (Wei and Yang, 2010; Wu et al., 2005).”
• Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China (2012, methodology): “This approach has been adopted by researchers to provide national analyses of Australia (Wood 2009), Denmark (Rormose and Olsen 2005; Wier 1998), India (Mukhopadhyay and Chakraborty 1999), Korea (Scown et al. 2011), the Netherlands (Wu et al. 2005), and the United States (Casler and Rose 1998).”