Networking for Competitiveness
By G. Kingsley, E. Malecki. 2004
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/363d7f7bee793e7fe6824b9c7ab48df91f9094ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- L. Klerkx
- Piers Thompson
- Andrew Johnston
- C. Leeuwis
- Robert Huggins
- Rebecca Steffenson
- Seun Azeez Olugbola
- B. Schoonjans
In Strategy and Management
- C. Leeuwis
- Piers Thompson
- L. Klerkx
- Robert Huggins
- Andrew Johnston
- Rebecca Steffenson
- Seun Azeez Olugbola
- H. Bauwhede
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy (2008, background): “If applicable knowledge is available locally, firms and other institutions will attempt to source and acquire it, if not they will look elsewhere (Kingsley and Malecki, 2004).”
- Exporting and innovation performance: Analysis of the annual Small Business Survey in the UK (2011, background): “Numerous authors focus on the information constraints that limit exporting behaviour; see for example Rogers (2004) or Kingsley and Malecki (2004) who focus on the importance of networking as well as the innovation process in explaining exporting behaviour.”
- Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure (2008, background): “Several studies show that both agricultural and non-agricultural SMEs prefer other sources of information (such as peers, suppliers, clients, professional magazines) above R&D institutes (Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001; Gielen et al., 2003; Solano et al., 2003; Kingsley and Malecki, 2004).”
- Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector (2009, background): “[50]) has not yet been fully accepted [56,57].”
- Formal business networking and SME growth (2013, background): “Furthermore, the majority of existing empirical papers are primarily based on survey evidence (e.g. Havnes and Senneseth 2001; Kingsley and Malecki 2004; Li et al. 2010).”
- Exploring entrepreneurial readiness of youth and startup success components: Entrepreneurship training as a moderator (2017, background): “…superior cognitive capabilities play an important role that helps lead students to notice opportunities that may influence the readiness to studies argued that the extent and depth of an individual’s social networks have impacts on opportunity recognition (Kingsley & Malecki, 2004; Parker, 2008).”
- What you know or who you know? The role of intellectual and social capital in opportunity recognition (2010, background): “The characteristics of an individual’s social network affect opportunity recognition (Koller, 1988; Kingsley and Malecki, 2004).”
- A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “If applicable knowledge is available locally, organisations may attempt to source and acquire it; if it is perceived as unavailable, they will look elsewhere (Kingsley and Malecki 2004).”