The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing

By N. House, Marc Davis, Morgan G. Ames, Megan Finn. CHI Extended Abstracts, 2005

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Museology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3638e5dfc79ba3fb757900f46ac0c7e7f6dadb05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Mor Naaman
2. Dean Eckles
3. Morgan G. Ames

In Museology

1. Mor Naaman
2. Morgan G. Ames

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Mor Naaman
2. Morgan G. Ames

Citations in the corpus

• Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media (2007, methodology): “[22] found similar artistic expression activity in”
• Uses and Gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook (2016, unknown): “…social interaction needs, such as self-expression, self-presentation, communicating, and maintaining and nurturing social relationships (Frohlich, Kuchinsky, Pering, Don, & Ariss, 2002; Goh et al., 2009; Oeldorf-Hirsch & Sundar, 2010; Pering, Nguyen, Light, & Want, 2005; N. Van House et al., 2005).”
• Over-exposed?: privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing (2007, background): “Some research efforts rely on diary studies [7,13,16], surveys [14,23] and interviews [19,26].”
• Digital photography: communication, identity, memory (2008, background): “Taking, sending and receiving photographs is a real-time experience and, like spoken words, image exchanges are not meant to be archived (Van House et al., 2005).”