Shellfish-DEPOMOD: Modelling the biodeposition from suspended shellfish aquaculture and assessing benthic effects

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Site selection for shellfish aquaculture by means of GIS and farm-scale models, with an emphasis on data-poor environments (2011, background): “…such as turbulence and erosion greatly reduce the impact of biodeposition from shellfish farms, which in contrast to finfish operations (e.g. Weise et al., 2009), normally only show problems derived from poor regulation (e.g. inappropriate siting with respect to current speed) and/or poor…”
Open water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: constraints on the effectiveness of mussels as an organic extractive component (2013, methodology): “Modeling approaches have been developed for predicting benthic fecal loading from both fish and shellfish aquaculture operations (Cromey et al. 2002, Weise et al. 2009).”
The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review (2012, background): “Biodeposition can significantly modify nutrient dynamics in the surrounding ecosystem, leading to an altered benthic community structure (Giles et al. 2006; Weise et al. 2009).”
Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: a review. (2011, methodology): “Recent advances have used this information, together with hydrodynamic modeling, to predict footprints of benthic loading around mussel farms (see reviews in Giles 2009; Weise et al. 2009).”