Variation in adult annual survival probability and remigration intervals of sea turtles
By Sebastian Tröeng, M. Chaloupka. 2007
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35f6989497a428f96cb63db30643abd78005ccdf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Encouraging outlook for recovery of a once severely exploited marine megaherbivore (2008, background): “The lack of increase in nesters at this rookery in recent years could be due to increasing sea surface temperature that affects breeding behaviour of this stock (Chaloupka, 2001; Limpus et al ., 2003), decreasing reproductive output as the stock approaches carrying capacity ( Troeng & Chaloupka, 200”
- Global analysis of satellite tracking data shows that adult green turtles are significantly aggregated in Marine Protected Areas (2012, background): “This role is anticipated to be substantiated due to the fact sea turtles show high fidelity to foraging habitats over considerable time frames (Broderick et al., 2007) and typically only return to breeding grounds every 2–7 years (Troëng & Chaloupka, 2007).”
- Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: A review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches (2008, background): “), stage-based survival rates (Crouse et al., 1987; Seminoff et al., 2003; Campbell and Lagueux, 2005; Chaloupka and Limpus, 2005; Troëng and Chaloupka, 2007), stage-based recruitment rates (Chaloupka and Musick, 1997; Chaloupka and Limpus, 2001), nesting remigration intervals (Troëng and Chaloupka,”
- Migratory dichotomy and associated phenotypic variation in marine turtles revealed by satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis (2011, background): “…size ultimately leads to differential lifetime reproductive outcome depends on a number of additional parameters such as variation in within-season clutch size and frequency, reproductive life expectancy and remigration interval (Broderick et al. 2001, Rivalan et al. 2005, Troëng & Chaloupka 2007).”