The Well-Being of Nations: Linking Together Trust, Cooperation, and Democracy

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

National Accounts of Well-Being (2012, background): “Finally, there is some evidence that the subjective well-being of citizens may facilitate support for democratic governance (Inglehart & Klingemann, 2000; Tov & Diener, 2008).”
How does happiness relate to economic behaviour? A review of the literature (2017, background): “…et al. (2013); Rahn and Transue (1998); Rodriguez-Pose and von Berlephsch (2014); Rukumnuaykit and Pholphirul (2016); Sulemana (2015b); Tov and Diener (2009); Yamamura et al. (2015); Yip et al. (2007); Zanin (2016) No correlation Unoka et al. (2009) Negative correlation Mellick (2014) Effect…”
Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: Some evidence from cross-country regressions (2009, background): “Social capital measured in various ways has often been found to have a strong impact on subjectivewell-being, working throughmany direct, indirect, and reverse channels (Diener and Suh, 1999; Helliwell, 2003; Helliwell and Putnam, 2004; Kroll, 2008; Tov and Diener, 2008).”
Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index (2013, background): “This notion follows Wright’s (2001) concept that all living things are linked in a fundamental web of interdependence and that our ultimate survival hinges upon finding solutions to social, political, and economic issues that are non-zero-sum (Tov and Diener, 2009).”