Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects

By L. Li. 2001

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35c1bb3effb6d40d1b31f1f957c68d3e16c58cd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Jan-Willem Strijbos
2. Nigel K. L. Pope

In Education

1. Jan-Willem Strijbos
2. J. Brouwer
3. Nigel K. L. Pope
4. Sumie Matsuno

In Media Technology

1. Nigel K. L. Pope

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment (2005, background): “A lot of work has examined assessment of group members' work by fellow group members (Lejk & Wyvill, 2001b; Li, 2001).”
• Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: a reflection on current assessment methods in higher education (2020, background): “…still subject to the aforementioned biases; hence, several corrections have been proposed for subjectivity and dishonesty of peer assessment scores (Li 2001), assessing oneself higher or lower than fellow group members (Bushell 2006), and large variations in individual scores due to the formula…”