Hosts, species and genotypes: opinions versus data

By P. W. Crous, Johannes Z. Groenewald. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2005

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35b29a349d9a70b7550c475ac5757a402656f1e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Phyllosticta—an overview of current status of species recognition (2011, background): “…is an important genus requiring modern revisionary treatment employing morphological characters and a molecular phylogenetic approach, as the understanding of species is less advanced, but molecular data are expected to reveal cryptic novel species (Crous and Groenewald 2005; Hyde et al. 2010a, b).”
No biogeographical pattern for a root-associated fungal species complex (2011, background): “Although sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of the rDNA is often regarded as a ‘gold standard’ in species diagnosis in fungi (Crous & Groenewald, 2005; Peay et al., 2007), the resolution of ITS sequences was not sufficient to differentiate species in this complex (Grünig et…”
The genus Cladosporium (2012, background): “…on the same lesions on a single host in Mycosphaerella and Teratosphaeria leaf disease complexes has been frequently described and discussed (Crous 1998, Crous et al. 2004b, 2007a, 2008a, b, 2009e, Crous & Groenewald 2005, Burgess et al. 2007, Arzanlou et al. 2008, Cheewangkoon et al. 2008).”
The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi (2011, background): “Using host species as a basis for recognizing species of Cercospora also failed the pogo stick hypothesis of Crous and Groenewald (2005) formulated by observing some species of Mycosphaerella, which proposed that host specific fungal plant pathogens often colonised non-host tissue or other substra”
What is a species in fungal plant pathogens? (2021, background): “2010; Crous and Groenewald 2005; Thines and Choi 2016).”
Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs (2009, background): “3 School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.”
Urban trees: bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection (2017, unknown): “It is estimated that fewer than 7% of the world’s fungi are currently known to science (Crous and Groenewald 2005), and these inefﬁciencies in fungal identiﬁcation are reﬂected in shortfalls in current biosecurity systems (Crous et al. 2016).”
One stop shop: backbones trees for important phytopathogenic genera: I (2014) (2014, methodology): “Phylogenetic analysis has been routinely used in species identification, in combination with morphological characters (Crous and Groenewald 2005; Hyde et al. 2010; Wikee et al. 2013c).”