Farmer Response to Policies Promoting Organic Farming Technologies in Finland

By K. Pietola, A. O. Lansink. 2001

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35a05b9af4cb9d083f21ed6d8f60d06b411f42ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. David Zilberman
2. W. Schneeberger
3. J. Gil
4. Teresa Serra
5. G. Van Huylenbroeck
6. Doris Laepple
7. O. Flaten
8. Gudbrand Lien

In Global and Planetary Change

1. David Zilberman
2. G. Van Huylenbroeck
3. John M. Holland
4. Hugh Kelley
5. Camilla Andersson
6. M. Wollni
7. I. Darnhofer

In Plant Science

1. Camilla Andersson
2. M. Wollni
3. W. Schneeberger
4. David Zilberman
5. J. Gil
6. G. Van Huylenbroeck
7. Doris Laepple
8. O. Flaten

Citations in the corpus

• Efficacy and economics of shelter habitats for conservation biological control (2008, background): “As a consequence, voluntary adoption of CBC techniques has been limited and is highly influenced by prevailing policy and commercial contexts that determine the costs–benefits associated with implementation (Falconer and Hodge, 2000; Pietola and Lansink, 2001).”
• Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale (2005, background): “Indeed, reports in the literature (Burton et al., 1999; Lohr and Salomonsson, 2000; Pietola and Lansink, 2001), as well as the decision model presented here, show that for most farmers perceived economic viability may be a necessary condition for conversion, but it is not a sufficient one.”
• Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers: the case of Spanish arable crop farmers (2008, background): “exclusively on the economic determinants of adoption ( Pietola and Oude Lansink 2001 ).”
• Modelling Farm Level Economic Potential for Conversion to Organic Farming (2007, background): “Various studies try to reveal the underlying factors determining the choice between conventional and organic farming and to explain the evolution of the growth of the organic sector (Sogaard, 1999; Michelsen, 2001; Pietola & Oude Lansink, 2001; Gardebroek, 2003).”
• Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption: Evidence from Honduras (2014, background): “Empirical studies by Bichler et al. (2005) and Pietola and Lansink (2001) for example reveal that organic farms are more likely to be located in regions with lower soil quality and in areas with lower average yield potential.”
• Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland (2015, background): “We follow Roe et al. (2002) in the approach that we assume that beyond a certain distance a spatial effect does no longer affect the adoption of organic farming.”
• Factors influencing the conversion to organic farming in Norway (2008, background): “Burton et al., 1999; Midmore et al., 2001; Schneeberger et al., 2002) or farm accounting data (e.g. Pietola and Lansink, 2001 ).”