Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios

By Volker Krey, Gunnar Luderer, Leon Clarke, Elmar Kriegler. Climatic Change, 2014

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/357a6a18ccd13422873b78a4e6f26970d5da1287

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives (2017, unknown): “Krey et al. (2014) and Sugiyama (2014) found electricity shares increased in stricter stabilization cases, whereas absolute increases in electricity were only found in the longer run, in few models (Edmonds et al., 2006).”
Technological Forecasting & Social Change (2014, background): “…community effort to explore the space of future mitigation pathways, including complementary model comparison studies such as the project EMF27 on the role of mitigation technologies by the Stanford Energy Modelling Forum (Kriegler et al., 2014d; Krey et al., 2014; Blanford et al., 2014).”
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “…(labelled with ‘limited bioenergy’ or ‘no CCS/BECCS’), decarbonisation (including fossil fuel phase-out) occurs more rapidly than in the most cost-efficient 2 ◦C scenarios (full portfolio), but at a higher overall cost (Kriegler et al 2014, Krey et al 2014a, Riahi et al 2015, Luderer et al 2014).”
Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants (2015, background): “tricity generation without CCS over the next century [4,5].”
Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver (2016, background): “…with 2 °C without BECCS (e.g. Luderer et al 2013), the modelling widely suggests that keeping climate change well below two degrees may not be feasible without BECCS, even with ambitious emission reductions in all sectors (Rogelj et al 2013, van Vuuren et al 2013, Krey et al 2014, Anderson 2015b).”
Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices (2017, background): “The global scenarios that achieve zero net emissions and maintain the temperature rise below 2°C in a cost-effective way show four parallel changes in the global economy, which involve the transformation of capital-intensive systems with long-lived assets (IDDRI and UNSDSN 2014; IEA 2014; Krey et al”
Getting to Zero Carbon Emissions in the Electric Power Sector (2018, background): “scenarios produced by 18 modeling groups, for example, electricity demand increases 20%–120% by 2050 (median estimate of 52%) and 120%– 440% by 2100; electricity supplies 25%–45% of total energy demand by mid-century and as much as 70% by 2100.(1) In the United States, electricity use could increase”
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions (2016, background): “There are distinct classes of NETs, such as: (1) bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)11,12; (2) direct air capture of CO2 from ambient air by engineered chemical reactions (DAC)13,14; (3) enhanced weathering of minerals (EW)15, where natural weathering to remove CO2 from the atmosphere ”
Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies (2016, background): “…of negative emissions technologies (NETs), that is technologies that result in the net removal of CO2/GHGs from the atmosphere (Edmonds et al., 2013; Rogelj et al., 2013; van Vuuren et al., 2013; Clarke et al., 2014; Edenhofer et al., 2014; Fuss et al., 2014; Krey et al., 2014; Riahi et al., 2015).”
Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis (2018, methodology): “In the AR5 period, the major modelling inter-comparison exercises focused on understanding the technological and economic requirements of meeting stringent long-term climate goals (Kriegler et al 2014, 2013b, 2015, Riahi et al 2015, Clarke et al 2009).”
The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design (2018, unknown): “Much like the shorter history of NETs, the theoretical need for CCS deployment was clear from mitigation scenario development before the first policy discussions on this technology took place (Krey, Luderer, Clarke, & Kriegler, 2014).”