On the automaticity of emotion

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Two Is Not Always Better Than One (2009, unknown): “…controlled processes (System 2) conflicts with recent findings about the role of goals and intentions on various automatic processes (e.g., Eitam, Hassin, & Schul, 2008; Moskowitz, 2002) and/or with the influence on controlled processes on the experience of emotion (Feldman Barrett et al., 2007).”
Context in Emotion Perception (2011, background): “…apparently context-less faces, many psychologists still operate on the assumption that there are six to ten emotions that are automatically (e.g., Tracy & Robins, 2008) and universally “recognized” in the face (i.e., are perceived as intended by the experimenter; Matsumoto, Keltner, Shiota,…”
Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies (2008, unknown): “Furthermore, many models of emotion are grounded in particular kinds of experiences (either one's own feelings or the experience of seeing someone else's behavior as emotional (for a review, see Barrett et al., 2007b).”
The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, unknown): “Our meta-analytic findings were relatively more consistent with the psychological operations that we have considered ingredients of emotion here and in other papers (e.g., Barrett 2006b; 2009; Barrett et al. 2007a; Kober et al. 2008; Lindquist & Barrett 2008a; Wager et al. 2008).”