Effect of landscape composition and arrangement on biological control agents in a simplified agricultural system: A cost–distance approach

By D. Perović, G. Gurr, A. Raman, H. Nicol. 2010

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3527d76733ebdc22f14bc53a54c43a462dc77c98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. Wratten
2. G. Gurr
3. M. Gillespie
4. Felix L. Wäckers
5. D. Landis
6. R. Isaacs
7. E. Brennan
8. W. E. Snyder

In Insect Science

1. G. Gurr
2. S. Wratten
3. M. Gillespie
4. Felix L. Wäckers
5. D. Landis
6. R. Isaacs
7. W. E. Snyder
8. E. Brennan

In Plant Science

1. G. Gurr
2. S. Wratten
3. M. Gillespie
4. W. E. Snyder

Citations in the corpus

• A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. (2011, unknown): “pest response to landscape complexity, contradicting previous studies that have shown enemies to be best predicted at smaller scales than pests (Thies et al. 2005; Perovic et al. 2010).”
• Beyond nectar provision: the other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents (2016, background): “Conservation biological control efforts that piggyback on the use of perennial woody vegetation on farms will also have the advantage that the presence of such vegetation appears to be important for effective natural enemy activity at the landscape scale by, for example, improving connectivity acros”