The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students

By M. M. Chemers, Eileen L. Zurbriggen, M. Syed, B. Goza, Steve Bearman. 2011

706 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/348d6b919f777a9f9533c810db8eef8e87e17ccb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. George Gunnesch-Luca
2. Raluca Livinƫi
3. A. Stewart
4. J. Malley
5. Nicola Curtin
6. D. Iliescu

In Social Psychology

1. George Gunnesch-Luca
2. Raluca Livinƫi
3. A. Stewart
4. J. Malley
5. Nicola Curtin
6. D. Iliescu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. George Gunnesch-Luca
2. Raluca Livinƫi
3. A. Stewart
4. Nicola Curtin
5. D. Iliescu

Citations in the corpus

• Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines (2016, neutral): “The relationship between this disciplinary identity and retention has been implied by one study in STEM that spanned three populations: advanced undergraduates, graduate students, and post-doctoral scholars [81].”
• Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students (2016, background): “In these mentoring relationships (as in many), the assumption is often made that the goal is both the transfer of complex knowledge and socialization to professional norms and standards, as well as guidance through a series of early career decisions and choices (Chemers et al. 2011; Weidman et al. 2”
• Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM (2016, background): “For example, program interventions that support and develop students’ science efficacy, identity, motivation, and values have been found to promote persistence (Chang et al., 2011; Chemers et al., 2011; Syed et al., 2011; Hernandez et al., 2012; Graham et al., 2013).”
• Research self-efficacy: A meta-analysis (2021, background): “…(RSES; Greeley et al., 1989; documented and reviewed in Bieschke et al., 1996), and to a lesser extent, the Research Attitudes Measure (RAM; O’Brien et al., 1998), the Research Self-efficacy Scale (RSS; B€uy€ukozt€urk et al., 2011), and the Science Self-efficacy Scale (SES; Chemers et al., 2011).”