A model of the entrepreneurial economy

By David B. Audretsch, Roy Thurik. 2004

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3450c0430297c6216ccc883ab9f31fffe737506c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter? (2017, background): “KM is considered to be the best strategy that businesses can use to improve their competition level (Audretsch & Thurik, 2004) since knowledge is a strategic resource that allows them to obtain a higher level of competitiveness and innovation (Chirico, 2008).”
COMPENDIA: Harmonizing Business Ownership Data Across Countries and Over Time (2005, background): “18 In the United States the leveling off may be due to shake out of industries that are in a more advanced stage than elsewhere in modern OECD countries (Audretsch and Thurik, 2004).”
Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development (2005, background): “Audretsch and Thurik (2001,2004) describe this transition as one from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy.”
Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976–2004 (2006, background): “…of the managed economy is the political, social and economic response to an economy dictated by the forces of large-scale production, reflecting the predominance of the production factors of capital and (unskilled) labor as the sources of competitive advantage (see also Audretsch and Thurik 2004).”
The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited (2007, background): “This reversal is first documented by Blau (1987) and Acs et al. (1994) while other conceptual explanations are given by Piore and Sable (1984), Jensen (1993), as well as Audretsch and Thurik (2001, 2004).”
Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments (2005, background): “First, this may have to do with the changing role of entrepreneurial activity during the last century (Audretsch and Thurik, 2001, 2004).1 Second, there is no generally accepted definition of entrepreneurship (Bull and Willard, 1993; Lumpkin and Dess, 1996; OECD, 1998; van Praag, 1999; Wennekers…”
Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (2006, background): “During this period, small businesses were generally less efficient than large firms and were only marginally involved in innovative activity and generated lower levels of employee opportunities (Audretsch and Thurik, 2004: 3).”
Entrepreneurship and the Process of Firms' Entry, Survival and Growth (2007, unknown): “…according to OECD (2003), industrial dynamics, i.e. the entry and exit of firms, would account for between 20 and 40 per cent of 1 According to Audretsch and Thurik (2004), and Carree and Thurik (2006) there are three channels by means of which entrepreneurship may positively affect economic…”
Quantifying the relationship between entrepreneurship and competitiveness development stages in Latin America (2011, methodology): “The third stage of economic development defined by Porter has some similarities to the arguments presented by Audretsch and Thurik (2001, 2004) which suggest that “entrepreneurial economies” are linked closely to countries in the innovation-oriented stages, while countries with “managed economies”…”